Mon premier blog

Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis Eugene W. Holland
Publisher: Routledge

Lvii+364pp., £20.00 This moment begins with the publication of Jean Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness, and concludes with the publication of Deleuze's last works, or maybe with Badiou himself (iii). What is it that makes the work of these two Frenchmen - delineated in books like 'Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia', 'Schizoanalytic Cartographies', 'Chaosmosis' and 'Difference and Repetition' - so compelling for so many people? To find a foothold in formations that are Oedipal or paranoid or even worse, rigidified territorialities that open the way for other transformational operations. The French philosopher Vincent Descombes once described Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus and Lyotard's Libidinal Economy as manifestations of what he called “mad black Hegelianism”. €�Introduction to schizoanalysis”: Deleuze and Guattari outline a practical ethics of schizoanalysis, promulgating the use-value of a malevolently destructive desire that purifies as does a curettage. The Adventure of French Philosophy Edited and translated with and introduction by Bruno Bosteels Verso, London - New York, 2012. Bolo'bolo - anarchist infoshop and vegan café, 76 Lower Main Road, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa, Dear all,Please join us on Wednesday the 15th of May for a short film and talk on the ideas and relevance of Deleuze and Guattari! 10) is a book review of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus. Clinical and political aspects of medicine and analysis in this seminar. Deleuze and Guattari derived two basic principles from their analysis of schizophrenia and its importance for philosophy: they called these the “molar” and the “molecular”. The discussion of machinic mapping versus representational tracing in the opening plateau of A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari claim that schizoanalysis, or rhizomatics, or whatever you want to call it, is itself a praxis, a doing. Versus phallogocentrism as pointed out by Cixous and Irigaray (“what the most privileged model of rocklike identity is goes without saying”), “Deleuze & Guattari describe it as the 'arborescent model' of thought (the proudly erect tree ..